By Lance Nixon Lance.Nixon@capjournal.com
June 11, 2014 11:42 pm
Call it a cold case for investigators trying to
track down one cold-blooded individual.
Biologists know that one of South Dakota’s two known
species of salamander was found here decades ago, but they’re not sure it’s here
now. So this summer and probably next winter, University of South Dakota
students will probe wetlands in northeastern South Dakota to try to sleuth out
the missing amphibian.
“We have a crew right now looking for a particular
salamander called the mudpuppy that has been seen since the 1920s. Our last
museum sample was from 1927,” said USD associate professor Jake Kerby. Kerby is
a herpetologist, or a scientist who studies reptiles and amphibians. “We are
going to survey Day, Marshall and Roberts counties.”
Kerby is optimistic that the species might still be
here after all, in part because in addition to those museum specimens from the
1920s and earlier, one of his USD students sorting through a collection up the
road at South Dakota State University at Brookings found a mudpuppy that had
been collected as recently as 1981.
“I feel pretty hopeful that they’re still out there,
just that they’re in low numbers and nobody’s looking for them,” Kerby
said.
Kerby said the only other salamander species in
South Dakota, the tiger salamander, is more common. Since South Dakota is at the
western edge of the eastern tiger salamander’s range and the western tiger
salamander’s range begins somewhere in eastern South Dakota, there may be quite
a lot of diversity within that tiger salamander’s population. To make matters
more complicated, the tiger salamander and the mudpuppy look alike in the larval
stages.
The only way to tell them apart at that stage is to
count the toes on the back feet. Kerby said the mudpuppy has four toes on the
back foot; the more common tiger salamander has five.
Kerby added that mudpuppies remain aquatic, so the
only salamander South Dakotans will ever see on land is the more common tiger
salamander.
Kerby and his colleagues have proposed a range for
the mudpuppy that would include the northeastern corner of South Dakota, the
eastern fringe of North Dakota, and western Minnesota. He added that colleagues
in Minnesota who catch mudpuppies have told him it’s actually easier to find
mudpuppies in winter, since the cold-blooded amphibians remain active under the
ice. His students will probably drill through the ice this winter and use traps
to try to capture mudpuppies in that same northeast part of the state; but they
are already searching for mudpuppies this summer.
The mystery of the vanished mudpuppies also has an
element of whodunit. If the salamanders have indeed vanished from the state, or
simply if they’re less abundant, there are plenty of potential
villains.
Kerby said introduced fish species sometimes leave
native species of salamander unable to adapt to an aggressive new predator.
Pollutants could be a factor. So could disease – especially one called chytrid
fungus that preys on amphibians in cold climates, and another called ranavirus.
And then there’s the biggest villain of all.
“The number one factor is just habitat loss,” Kerby
said. “That can include drainage of wetlands or modification of
lakes.”
There are an estimated 15 species of amphibians in
South Dakota in all, Kerby said, though the count sometimes varies depending on
how scientists count certain species.
A grant from the South Dakota Department of Game,
Fish & Parks supports the project.
Kerby notes that anyone who has found a mudpuppy –
remember to look for four toes instead of five on the back feet – should
photograph it and contact Kerby directly Jacob.Kerby@usd.edu.
Or contact Casey.Heimerl@state.sd.us.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!