Cities have long been
understood to be human constructs; that is, its history of builders have bent
nature to human’s needs. Coastlines were re-contoured for harbours or casinos. River-valleys
were filled in for reservoirs or highways. Forests were replaced with houses or
stadiums. The day’s logic dictated the need to shape the earth to provide
humans with the goods needed for their survival (food, water, shelter and so
on).
This anthropocentric
view, however, is displaying disastrous consequences—from psychological
disorders associated with a lack of exposure to nature, to flooded cities, to
collapsed ecological processes that are needed to provide us with food, water,
shelter, and so on.
Studies continue to push
back against this view. We're advancing to recognize that the equation is not
society and nature but rather society in nature, that how we plan cities is a
way of organizing nature. Studying the needs of lizards is one way to parse
this equation.
Authors
in the journal Urban Ecosystems state that climate
change will drive "half of the world’s lizard population to
extinction." Exacerbating the collapse may be the warmer temperatures
experienced in cities. Termed the urban heat island effect, this phenomenon
occurs when the temperature in the city becomes higher than the surrounding
rural areas. Reports indicate these temperatures can range from 1-3°C to as
much as 12°C hotter.
Using a location in
metropolitan Phoenix, the main objective of the study investigated "which
landscaping styles and microhabitat variables can most effectively reduce the
surface temperatures experienced by lizards." Exposed under the hot sun
lizard activity time was restricted to a few hours, the authors said.
"While heavily irrigated grass and shade trees allowed for continual
activity during even the hottest days." Those areas under shade with
increased humidity and access to a view of the sky explained the cooling effect
needed for lizards to survive in the metropolitan climate.
This work continues
to cast a bright light informing that planning cities for humans is not
divorced from planning cities for nature; they are not mutually exclusive. For
example, the research provides planners with scientifically-based work
indicating a type of urban form that could mutually benefit humans and
wildlife.
The ecologists warn that
with continuing urbanization and climate change over the coming decades heat
stress will continue to become an increasingly important facet of city living
for humans, plants, and animals. The authors suggest that maintaining an
existing diversity of landscaping styles necessary for the lizards parallels
the ongoing mitigation strategy to lessen the urban heat island effect targeted
at humans.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!