July 18, 2016
Migrating birds flock together and salmon swim upstream in schools because there's a navigational advantage: By traveling in groups, individuals are more likely to get to their destinations – or so a growing body of research suggests.
But the advantages of group navigation often come with strings attached, according to new research by SFI Omidyar Fellow Andrew Berdahl and collaborators: Populations relying on group navigation could be vulnerable to sudden collapse.
Studies of migrating animals such as cranes only recently confirmed the benefits of collective animal navigation; whether group navigation has other consequences isn't yet well understood.
To start to explore the question, Berdahl, SFI Science Board member Simon Levin, and two others developed models aimed at understanding how group migration affects species' population sizes and structures.
Perhaps their most striking finding is that migratory populations are bistable – that is, group navigation can drive a population to greater size or nearly to extinction, depending on context.
As an example, suppose overfishing is driving down the sizes of Pacific salmon runs. Fisheries managers using traditional, standard models could be blindsided by a collapse because their models don't account for the nonlinearities introduced by social navigation effects. If a population size gets too low, individuals might no longer successfully coordinate their travels, leaving the remaining population vulnerable to collapse. It's an outcome that wouldn't happen, Berdahl says, if the animals navigated individually.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!