From the Blog “The Friendly Atheist”
October 3, 2013 By Hemant Mehta
Tom Hennigan, a professor at (Christian) Truett-McConnell College knows the exact number and
posted his paper in the Creationist Answers Research Journal.
Most of his paper consists of descriptions of
different kinds of frogs and whether or not they may have been on the boat,
with summaries like this:
… Though mostly aquatic, there is no reason that Noah
could not have had these on board. Because of respiratory anatomy, doubts about
Flood survival hardiness, and to avoid underestimating Ark kind numbers, I include them until
further data shows obvious post-Flood diversification from other terrestrial
anuran taxa.
…
… Because of their unique dermal brooding, respiratory
anatomy, my desire to avoid underestimating Ark
kinds, and relative ease of keeping in captivity, I include them in the Ark as a kind.
…
… They are explosive breeders and mate when heavy
rains form large pools. Because of their uniqueness I include them as a
separate Ark
kind.
This goes on for a while.
Until we get to the conclusion:
With the above in mind, I tentatively place the number
of extant anuran kinds on the Ark
at 140. Whatever the number actually was, it is clear that frogs and toads
represent the amazing diversity that is consistent with the Creator’s triune
character and the creative wisdom required to build fascinating creatures with
the ability to persist and thrive, in a fallen world.
So there you go. 140 different kinds of frogs on
Noah’s Ark.
Unless you’re reading the PDF version of his essay in which case the
number is actually 139. (But who’s counting?)
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!