9/27/13 Cayman News Service
Animal welfare
issues relating to the Cayman Turtle Farm (CTF) have been detailed in a
scientific report published Friday in the Journal of Agricultural and
Environmental Ethics. The report points to the physical injury, disease and
abnormal behaviour of turtles at the farm observed by the authors, based on
evidence provided by the World Society for the Protection of Animals, a site
inspection and research. The findings point to physical and behaviour problems
of the sea turtles at the farm being “indicative of problematic management and
captivity-related stress,” which the scientists said demonstrated the
limitations of turtles to adapt to captivity.
The WSPA, which is
continuing its campaign to persuade the CTF to change to a conservation
facility, said the report, entitled "Welfare and Environmental
Implications of Farmed Sea Turtles", presents a major challenge for the
managers of the Cayman Turtle Farm, who had committed to improving conditions
for what are now estimated to be around 9,500 turtles in their care.
The report was written by
three specialised reptile biologists: Phillip Arena of Murdoch
University, Catrina Steedman of the Emergent Disease Foundation,
and Clifford Warwick, a London-based biologist and medical scientist who was
recently offered the post of Fellow at the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics in
recognition of his long career and scientific contributions to reptile welfare
and conservation.
“The problematic physical
and behavioural signs, in our view, related to the inherent nature of intensive
turtle propagation which in particular involves overt- and crypto-overcrowding
and under stimulating environments, and an associated failure to meet all the
physical, biological and innate behavioural needs of sea turtles,” the authors
said in the conclusions about the farm.
The animal welfare charity WPSA said the report tallies with their results following the controversial undercover investigation conducted over a year ago that documented the extent of problems at the Farm, which the CTF has been at pains to deny. However, this latest scientific report also contradicts the farm management’s claims following its own assessment inspection in December, when the farm said there was no strong evidence for WSPA’s concerns about animal welfare.
The animal welfare charity WPSA said the report tallies with their results following the controversial undercover investigation conducted over a year ago that documented the extent of problems at the Farm, which the CTF has been at pains to deny. However, this latest scientific report also contradicts the farm management’s claims following its own assessment inspection in December, when the farm said there was no strong evidence for WSPA’s concerns about animal welfare.
Talking about the work of
the scientists, one of the authors, Clifford Warwick, said that the detailed
evidence- based research into farming practices at the farm has highlighted a
range of physical and behavioural problems, some of which are extremely
serious.
“In our view, these concerns are unresolvable, the Farm simply cannot replicate the turtle’s natural habitat, nor can it meet their biological needs within a captive environment. Also, the transmission of potentially dangerous pathogens from the turtles to the visiting public continues to represent a significant health risk,” he said, adding that the recent changes instituted by the CTF did not alter any of these concerns.
The WSPA campaign to persuade the management to transition the facility away from farming towards conservation continues and has drawn support from over 180,000 people worldwide, as well as a host of animal welfare and conservation organisations. The campaign leader for WSPA, Dr Neil D’Cruze, said the report documents physical and behavioural problems among the marine animals consistent with animal cruelty, which is extremely worrying.
“In our view, these concerns are unresolvable, the Farm simply cannot replicate the turtle’s natural habitat, nor can it meet their biological needs within a captive environment. Also, the transmission of potentially dangerous pathogens from the turtles to the visiting public continues to represent a significant health risk,” he said, adding that the recent changes instituted by the CTF did not alter any of these concerns.
The WSPA campaign to persuade the management to transition the facility away from farming towards conservation continues and has drawn support from over 180,000 people worldwide, as well as a host of animal welfare and conservation organisations. The campaign leader for WSPA, Dr Neil D’Cruze, said the report documents physical and behavioural problems among the marine animals consistent with animal cruelty, which is extremely worrying.
“Despite WSPA raising
concerns over a year ago, this new scientific report shows that the turtles are
still suffering,” he said. “WSPA has met with the new Caymanian Government and
had open and candid talks to ensure that positive steps are taken to help the
thousands of sea turtles which continue to suffer at the Cayman Turtle Farm. We
hope the new government will learn from the errors of its predecessors and
ultimately see that the long term solution for the Cayman Turtle Farm is to
become a turtle rehabilitation and release facility,” the charity leader added.
The Turtle Farm has been
battling the fallout from the bad publicity since the WSPA’s report went public
in October last year. It comes at a time when public attention on the farm has
also focused on the massive almost $10 million subsidy provided to the facility
every year from an increasingly tight public purse.
Despite the major issues,
the CTF enjoyed a bumper year this breeding season and recently cut the price
of meat as a result of the increase in production. The farm has also claimed a
number of improvements in the conditions and it has now employed a full time
vet.
Responding to the latest
report on Friday, the CTF seemed unconcerned and said the findings were a
rehash of the previous WSPA report. It accused the charity of trying another
publicity attack with what it said was more WSPA-sponsored research.
“This latest article
really isn’t saying much of anything the WSPA hasn’t already said before,” said
Tim Adam, Managing Director of CTF. “It repeats the same allegations the WSPA
made previously citing the same authors, and basically comes across as just
another effort by the WSPA to force the Cayman Turtle Farm and the CI Government
to completely change the operating model of the CTF since the WSPA campaign has
thus far been unsuccessful in achieving that aim.”
Adam said the charity
wants to stop turtle farming, stop a legal source of meat, stop public
interaction with turtles, and stop the release programmes.
“Apparently the WSPA has
sponsored yet another report hoping it will help them achieve those
objectives,” he said, insisting that the farm had been vindicated by it's own
inspection last year, despite the extensive photographic evidence of the
scientists’ findings to the contrary, and that the turtles were in good shape.
“At the Cayman Turtle
Farm we are committed to the health, safety and well-being of both our guests
and our animals and we continue to strive for the highest standards in all the
key aspects of the work we do - sea turtle reproduction and husbandry,
conservation, display and education,” Adam said. “The independent inspection of
our operations confirmed the validity of our research and conservation work,
and also highlighted areas for improvement. We have worked hard since the
publication of the inspection report to address the issues raised by the
independent inspectors, and we strive for continued improvements.”
Adam dismissed the latest
findings as the same accusations. “We are frankly disappointed that the WSPA
continues to repeat their same accusations about the Cayman Turtle Farm in
order to damage our reputation and impede our work,” he added.
See full scientific
report go to
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10806-013-9465-8/fulltext.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!