New York Times, by Stephh Yin, 4/12/17
The
ocellated lizard — known as the jeweled lacerta in the pet trade — is
born rusty brown with white polka dots. Within a few months, its skin
begins to change into a dizzying, labyrinthine array of black and bright
green pixels. By the time the lizard has sexually matured, reaching up
to two feet in length, some 4,000 scales along its back are all black or
green, possibly to accommodate a habitat change between early life and
adulthood. Through the rest of the lizard’s life, many of these scales
will continuously flip between black and green.
These
outfit changes are dazzling in their own right. But even more
surprisingly, the lizard’s patterns may unfold like a computer
simulation, according to a study published in Nature on Wednesday.
Studying ocellated lizards, Michel Milinkovitch, a professor of genetics and evolution at the University of Geneva, noticed the animals’ scales seemed to behave like a cellular automaton,
a rule-based model often used in computer science. The general rule was
that green scales tended to have four black neighbors, and black scales
tended to have three green neighbors.
Though
cellular automata are commonly used to simulate biological systems on
computers, this is the first example of a “living cellular automaton,”
said Dr. Milinkovitch, an author of the paper.
Cellular
automata were discovered in the 1940s by John von Neumann and Stanislaw
Ulam, then mathematicians at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, who
wanted to build a self-replicating machine. An extremely simple cellular
automaton, according to Andy Ilachinski, author of Cellular Automata: A Discrete Universe,
who was not involved in the study, is a string of lights where each
light switches between on and off depending on what its neighbors are
doing. With more complex rules, cellular automata can be used to model
many things, from snowflake formation to traffic
To
look for a cellular automaton in ocellated lizards, Dr. Milinkovitch,
with Liana Manukyan and Sophie Montandon, then graduate students,
collected high-resolution scans of three lizards’ bodies from hatchling
stages to adulthood. From this, the researchers inferred a set of rules —
a cellular automaton — for how the scales changed color. If a green
scale had many green neighbors, there was a high probability it would
turn black. If it had no green neighbors, it would stay green.
Simulating
their cellular automaton, the researchers found it generated a pattern
indistinguishable from real lizard patterns. Next, they wondered how the
lizards were making these patterns. Their answer came from another
mathematician: Alan Turing, pioneer of computer science and artificial intelligence.
In the 1950s, Mr. Turing mathematically modeled
how patterns and shapes take form in living things. Called a
reaction-diffusion system, his model proposed that patterns emerge from a
feedback loop between chemicals that spread through a space, activating
and inhibiting each other. His mechanism has since been demonstrated in
many organisms. In zebrafish, Turing interactions between cells
containing different colors of pigment have been shown to generate stripes.
Dr.
Milinkovitch suspected a similar Turing mechanism was at play in
ocellated lizards. But when he transferred the zebrafish model to
lizards, the patterns that emerged were off. Instead of pixelated
designs, with each scale being discretely green or black, they were
smooth designs, with many scales containing both colors.
It
looked as if the lizard’s skin were a flat canvas, as opposed to a
scaly one with ridges and valleys, Dr. Milinkovitch thought. His team
re-simulated the Turing mechanism, this time accounting for how the
valleys between lizard scales might impede the flow of signals between
pigmentary cells of different colors. Remarkably, the pattern that
emerged behaved like a cellular automaton. To solidify this link, Stanislav Smirnov,
a mathematics professor at the University of Geneva, created a set of
Turing equations that reproduced the cellular automaton behavior
observed.
Tracking
an animal’s pattern in fine detail over a long period of time to infer
the “rules” that govern the pattern is “a great example of computational
imaging,” said Leah Edelstein-Keshet,
a professor of mathematics at the University of British Columbia, who
was not involved in the research. “I had never seen anything like this
before.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!