Showing posts with label mark twain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mark twain. Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 August 2017

Why Mark Twain Was Wrong About Lizards - via Herp Digest


8/14/17 by Sarah Marley Guest Post, Blog, British Ecology Journal

In the many discussions regarding Mark Twain, relatively few probably relate to his opinion on lizards. However, this is the focus of our guest post by Professor Shai Meiri from Tel Aviv University, which aptly marks World Lizard Day (14th August)!

One of humanities greatest wits – and one of the first modern tourists – Mark Twain, visited the Holy Land some 150 years ago and was greatly unimpressed. He found a sparsely populated region, little exposed to modern ideas and technology, which seemed to have lost its glorious past, gaining nothing in exchange – except for lizards. Twain did not care much for lizards: “Gray lizards, those heirs of ruin, of sepulchres and desolation, glided in and out among the rocks or lay still and sunned themselves. Where prosperity has reigned, and fallen; where glory has flamed, and gone out; where beauty has dwelt, and passed away; where gladness was, and sorrow is; where the pomp of life has been, and silence and death brood in its high places, there this reptile makes his home, and mocks at human vanity. His coat is the color of ashes: and ashes are the symbol of hopes that have perished, of aspirations that came to nought, of loves that are buried. If he could speak, he would say, Build temples: I will lord it in their ruins; build palaces: I will inhabit them; erect empires: I will inherit them”. What a dreadful way to talk about the stunning creature that was (most probably) a hardun (Stellagama stellio).

Even in a recent newspaper article praising the glorious past of the Negev Desert in Israel, one could find a dichotomy, such as Twain’s , between glory on the one hand, and lizards on the other: “If we visited the central Negev 1,700 years ago, far from a barren wasteland peopled mainly by nomads and lizards, we would see a countryside dotted with farms and monasteries”.

Lizards are certainly ubiquitous in deserts, in themselves stunning places with unique, fascinating and often fragile ecosystems. They are among the easiest animals to observe in these open, sunny terrains. Being relatively large and abundant, and with a tendency to sun themselves in exposed places it is not surprising the BBC’s “Life in cold blood” called these often remarkably warm-blooded animals “dragons of the dry”. In fact, most lizard species reside in tropical regions, and they generally abhor cold places, making lizards in general (and nocturnal geckos in particular) scarce in cold places, such as much of northern Europe and North America. But because most animals are most diverse in the tropics, whereas lizards are the only major group to have diversity hotspots in deserts worldwide (and especially, in Australia), they are regarded as the quintessential desert animals. Yet lizards have more than one trick up their scaly sleeve. This is a hugely successful and diverse group of some 6500 recognized species (with around 120 new species described yearly). They range in size from the mighty 100 kg “dragon” – the famous Komodo monitor, to the miniscule 0.1 gram or less Sphaerodactylus geckos of the Caribbean.

While most walk on all fours, some run on two, some slide in a snakelike fashion (many lizards seem to really want to be snakes, losing their limbs in the course of evolution, indeed snakes, another hugely successful reptilian group of some 3600 described species, evolved from lizards), while others climb, burrow, swim and even glide. Lizards predominantly eat small animals but many species eat plants. Most are active by day yet there also many nightwalkers; and while most lay eggs, about 18% of species give birth to live young. It is plain to see that lizards are hugely varied and successful, and some are among our best known “model organisms” for the study of evolution (particularly the Caribbean anoles) – and yet , Twain’s attitude still prevails. A large proportion of the described species have only recently been discovered and are poorly known. Last year I estimated that since the turn of the century around 1300 lizard species have been described (Meiri 2016). This number has now reached 1531. Some of these newly described lizards are truly spectacular, for example the aptly named Sarada superba (www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160308-the-beautiful-brightly-coloured-lizards-that-nobody-noticed ; www.pinterest.com/pin/483644447466451404/) and Cnemaspis psychedelica.

Lizards do not typically harm humans in any direct or indirect way (the Komodo dragon being nearly the only exception), and there seems little reason for animosity towards them. Nonetheless commonly held beliefs and superstitions deriving from misconceptions and ‘alternative facts’, generally dominate people perception of these charismatic critters. Humans, on the other hand, frequently harm lizards either directly or indirectly. We use them for food, let our pet dogs and cats prey on them, collect them in the wild for the pet trade, destroy their habitats and sometime even kill them for no apparent reason. This is something I would love to see change in future.

One of the earliest references to lizards in human history is full of admiration, referring to them as “exceedingly wise“. The bible provides a beautiful reference to them: “A gecko can be caught by hand but resides in the palaces of kings”*.

Indeed, lizards often share our homes, using them for shelter while hunting true pest insects. This beautiful mutualistic relationship between humans and lizards is to be celebrated and a much more apt way to perceive these wonderful creatures.

More information:
Meiri, S. 2016. Small, rare and trendy: traits and biogeography of lizards described in the 21st century. Journal of Zoology 299: 251-261. doi:10.1111/jzo.12356.


*My translation from the original Hebrew “שממית בידיים תיתפס, והיא בהיכלי מלך”, there are many translations and somewhat of a debate what is meant by the Hebrew “Smamit” (“שממית”), with some calling it a spider, others a lizard, some a gecko. I choose to refer to a gecko, the modern Hebrew version of the word, as spiders and lizards appear elsewhere in the bible with their current Hebrew names, “Smamit” is close to the Greek word for gecko “Σαμιαμίδι” – “Samyamidi”, and the behavior described in the bible is just so, well, gecko-like.

Saturday, 24 July 2010

Calaveras Frogs Jump Farther (HerpDigest)

Calaveras Frogs Jump Farther (Mark Twain)
by Michael Kay, 7/16/10 Union Democrat, Angels Camp, California

Scientists from two of the nation's top research universities announced last weekend that they agree with Mark Twain: Calaveras County's jumping frogs should be celebrated.

A year after four researchers from Brown and Northeastern universities traveled to Angels Camp in 2009 to videotape 3,449 frog jumps over the three days of the 82nd annual Jumping Frog Jubilee, the unofficial results are in.

Using footage from their HD camcorder, a specialized grid system and an algorithm that accounts for perspective, researchers from the two institutions determined that an American bullfrog can leap 7.2 feet in a single bound - shattering the previous record.

Herpetologists - scientists who study amphibians and reptiles - have long relied on a paper published in 1978 by Smithsonian Institution biologist George Zug that found the single leap max for a bullfrog, or rana catesbeiana, to be 4.3 feet.

"He just got a whole bunch of frogs and jumped them down the hall at the Smithsonian," said Henry Astley, a doctoral student at Brown and the author of the paper.

As Jon Kitchell, a founding member of the Calaveras Frog Jockeys, will tell you, there's a lot more to it than that.

Some frogs are suited for jumping. The temperature of the jumping surface must be just right. And the temperature of the frog has to be perfect.

A degree too hot for a minute too long, and frogs become "gellied" - soft and mushy and disinclined to move - said Kitchell. Too cool and they start to hibernate.

Then there's the motivation. Shrieks, stomping feet, sharply blown air and gentle tickles were in common use at this year's event.

"We trick them into thinking that we're coming to eat them, essentially," Kitchell said with a chuckle.

But it did not take a top jockey and their best frog to beat the old record. Fifty-four percent of the recorded jumps were greater than 4.3 feet, according to the findings.

"Were the pro frogs tested for steroids?" asked herpetologist Matt Hinderliter of the The Nature Conservancy in Mississippi, half-joking, during the presentation.

He was told, he said Thursday, that no froggy urine samples were taken. But given many of the event's rental frogs were among those who beat the previous record, the team did not believe doping was responsible for Calaveras County frogs' prowess.

Astley and his colleagues presented their results July 10 at the 2010 Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, but they have not yet published the data in a scientific journal.
Since many journals prohibit researchers talking to the media prior to publication, Astley said he could not comment on the study.

But Emily Taylor, an assistant professor of biological sciences with California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, who attended Astley's presentation, said it could have wide-reaching significance.
Related Posts with Thumbnails

ShareThis