In the race to adapt to a rapidly
changing climate, warm-blooded animals might have the edge.
New research suggests that over
millions of years of planetary history, birds and mammals have outperformed
amphibians and reptiles at adapting to changing temperatures and shifting their
habitats to more suitable locations.
The study published
yesterday in Nature Ecology and Evolution analyzed data on more than
11,000 vertebrate species, including fossil records from the past 270 million
years. Comparing these records with ancient temperature reconstructions, the
researchers found that warm-blooded animals had much greater success at
expanding their ranges and adapting to new climate conditions. These shifts
tended to occur much more slowly in cold-blooded animals.
"We see that mammals and
birds are better able to stretch out and extend their habitats, meaning they
adapt and shift much easier," lead study author Jonathan Rolland, a
postdoctoral research fellow at Canada's University of British Columbia, said
in a statement. "This could have a deep impact on extinction rates and
what our world looks like in the future.”
There are several reasons
warm-blooded animals may have historically one-upped their scaly cousins.
Because birds and mammals regulate their own body temperatures, they don't have
to adjust their behavior according to the outside temperature as dramatically
as cold-blooded animals. Amphibians and reptiles, for instance, must often
significantly scale back their activity levels in cooler weather, which puts
them at a disadvantage when it comes to finding food, mates or new habitats, according
to the research.
Warm-blooded animals are also
able to use their own bodies to keep their developing babies warm, while
cold-blooded animals must stay within suitable climate conditions for their
eggs to develop and hatch.
In the past, these traits have
been particularly useful at helping birds and mammals disperse around the world
during periods of global cooling, the researchers point out, including a major
cooling episode that occurred around 34 million years ago. But some scientists
believe that the current period of rapid global warming may disproportionately
affect cold-blooded animals, as well.
Barry Sinervo, a reptile and
ecology expert at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who was not
involved with the recent study, pointed to some of his own research, such as
a study published
in Science in May 2010 that examined extinction rates in lizards
alongside changing climatic conditions.
The study projected that as many as
20 percent of lizard species worldwide could go extinct by 2080, and local
extinctions—the disappearance of a population in one particular geographic
location—could reach as high as 40 percent. The study also suggested that about
4 percent of local populations have already gone extinct since 1975.
While it's easy to think that
snakes and lizards might be happy to bask in warmer weather, reptiles—like any
other animals—have their temperature limits. As global temperatures continue to
climb, some areas may grow too hot for their cold-blooded inhabitants. And the
new study suggests that, historically speaking, these animals are slower at
expanding into more suitable habitats.
"I would have to agree with
the authors, that ectotherms are at much higher risk than endotherms,"
Sinervo said.
Reprinted from Climatewire with
permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential
energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.
(Yes this article is four years old, but I
missed it, and it is still relevant, especially in context with the article it
follows.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!