By Taylor Hill 1/7/15 Takepart.com
The
shingleback lizard, or “sleepy lizard,” as it’s known in Australia, may
be slow moving, but it could be one of the first animals to feel the
effects of agricultural pesticides.
That’s
according to a new study showing that sleepy lizards, and similar
indicator species around the world, could provide advanced warning of
the impact of agricultural chemicals on plants, people, and wildlife.
Two
populations of lizards were monitored: one near an agriculture-intense
region of southern Australia and one living in undeveloped rangelands.
The
result? More than half the farm lizards were found to be anemic,
lacking a sufficient number of red blood cells. Scientists found no
signs of anemia in the rangeland lizards.
So
are the farm-based lizards not getting enough iron in their diet? Not
exactly. Instead, the fertilizers, weed killers, and insecticides in the
agricultural environment are most likely the cause of anemia, said
David Phalen, an associate professor at the University of Sydney and the
coauthor of the study, which was published in the journal Royal Society Open Science.
“These
lizards were exposed to a large range of chemicals, including
herbicides, insecticides, and rodenticides,” Phalen said. But because
the animals were studied in their natural habitat, pinpointing which
chemical is causing anemia in the lizards wasn’t possible.
One probable candidate, Phalen said, is zinc phosphide, found in mouse baits that were in wide use during the study.
“Sleepy lizards are omnivores and could have eaten either the baits or poisoned mice,” Phalen said.
No
matter which poison caused the disease, the research points to the
importance of identifying particular species that can sound the alarm on
environmental health.
“Around the world, any sedentary reptile could be a potential indicator species,” Phalen said.
In
the United States, he said, box turtles could be a good species for
monitoring exposure to farm pollution, while a red-eared slider—a water
turtle—could be used to examine the effect of chemical exposure in
freshwater environments.
“The
fact this species is being affected by chemicals means other wildlife,
livestock, and even humans sharing the same environment may be
affected,” Phalen said, “and it suggests the health of other reptiles
may also indicate the overall health of the environment.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!