February 12,
2019 by Sarah Marley, The Conversation
Life in the
sea isn't easy. Talk to most people about the ocean and they are likely to
imagine a tropical scene with a stretch of golden sand and warm, clear water.
The reality is often quite different – the marine environment can be a
surprisingly cold place.
Water
conducts heat far more effectively than air, which means that submerged animals quickly
lose their body heat. It's also
harder to warm up again than on dry land, where animals often have the option
of basking in the sun or on hot rocks. Finally, many aquatic animals use gills
to get oxygen – great for breathing, but essentially another source of heat
loss due to all the of water flowing across them and sucking away warmth.
All this
contributes to making it much harder for aquatic animals to
regulate their body temperature. So
surely it would make sense to find more marine animals in
warmer waters rather than in colder ones?
Not
necessarily. A new study published in Science by
a team of US researchers led by John Grady reports higher levels of marine
biodiversity in polar waters than tropical ones – but only for some types of
animals.
This goes
against the longstanding idea that species richness is
always highest in the tropics. The theory was that tropical waters provide a
less thermally-extreme environment than polar ones – compare, for example, the
Caribbean with Antarctica. Tropical areas often provide greater stability and
productivity, giving benefits such as a predictable
environment and plenty of food. As a result, scientists typically report high levels of biodiversity
in warmer waters, with a multitude of species making the
most of these favourable areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!