Giant pandas should be allowed to die out, BBC wildlife expert Chris Packham has said.
Published: 7:00AM BST 22 Sep 2009
The television presenter said that the species was not strong enough to survive on its own and that the millions spent preserving them could be better spent elsewhere.
Mr Packham, who hosts BBC2’s Springwatch, also argued that breeding the animals in captivity for later release was pointless because there is not enough habitat left to sustain them.
He said: “Here’s a species that of its own accord has gone down an evolutionary cul-de-sac. It’s not a strong species.
“Unfortunately, it’s big and cute and it’s a symbol of the World Wildlife Fund – and we pour millions of pounds into panda conservation.
“I reckon we should pull the plug. Let them go with a degree of dignity.”
The 48-year-old also claimed that tigers could become extinct with two decades.
He told the Radio Times: “Animals are invariably becoming extinct because there’s no secure habitat for them.
“Where are you going to release them? I don’t think tigers are going to last another 15 years. How can you conserve an animal that’s worth more dead than alive? You can’t.”
Giant pandas have been dying out because of the destruction of their natural habitat and are only found in about 20 patches of forest in a densely populated region of China.
There are around 1,600 in the wild with around 180 more being reared in captivity.
Fellow wildlife expert David Bellamy lent his support to Mr Packham. “I agree completely,” he said. “When I was a WWF trustee I begged them to buy big chunks of the land in which these animals live, not just go on spending millions on rearing pandas in captivity.
“You can’t release them back into the wild if there is no wild left and we shouldn’t rear animals just to put them into cages.
“Even the WWF admitted there is no longer enough land for them to live on.”
However, Dr Mark Wright, a conservation science adviser for WWF described Mr Packham’s comments as “daft” and “irresponsible”.
He said: “Pandas have adapted to where they live. They live in the mountains where there is plenty of the bamboo they want to eat.
“It’s like saying the blue whale is in an evolutional cul-de-sac because it lives in the ocean.”
Dr Wright added that pandas face extinction due to poaching and humans moving into their habitat, and that if left alone they would not be under threat.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/6216775/Chris-Packham-Giant-pandas-should-be-allowed-to-die-out.html
Tuesday, 22 September 2009
Chris Packham: 'Giant pandas should be allowed to die out'
Labels:
critically endangered,
endangered,
extinction,
panda,
Zoos
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!