Date: October 31, 2016
Source: Cornell University
If you want people to care about
endangered species, focus on how many animals are left, not on the chances of a
species becoming extinct, according to a new study by Cornell University
communication scholars.
Since the 1960s, conservation experts
have used specific labels to indicate how precariously a species is teetering
on the brink of extinction. Categories like "critically endangered,"
"endangered" and "vulnerable" are meant to communicate how
much risk animals face.
Conservation biologists use
statistics about a species' population and the territory it inhabits to figure
out which category it belongs in.
But researchers found that what
scientists think those numbers say about a species' risk of extinction, and how
the public perceives that risk, can be strikingly different.
"Although experts view these
statistics as equal, the public does not. This research shows the numbers
experts use don't necessarily register the same level of risk in the public's
mind," said Hwanseok Song, a doctoral candidate in the field of
communication and author of the study.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!