Date: August 7, 2018
Source: University of Turku
Summary:
Humans have been capturing wild
Asian elephants for more than 3,000 years, and this still continues today
despite the fact that the populations are declining. An international team of
researchers has now analysed records of timber elephants in Myanmar to understand
the effects of capture. The study shows that even years after their capture,
wild-caught elephants' mortality rate remains increased, and their average life
expectancy is several years shorter compared to captive-born animals.
Millions of wild animals are
captured alive each year for a diverse range of purposes. While members of some
species can thrive in captivity and are healthier, live longer, and produce
more offspring than their free-living counterparts, many others perform far
worse. Elephants, for example, are known to be at a much higher risk of dying
when captive in zoos compared to living in the wild. Comparisons like these,
however, mainly illustrate the differences in the diet, social environment,
exercise possibilities, and disease patterns between zoos and wild
environments. They provide little insight to how the capture of wild elephants
might affect their long-term well-being in captivity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!