How did a tiny, reclusive,
underground animal colonize so much of the world? The answer to this and other
unexpected animal migrations could be “rafting”
by Elsa Panciroli, The Guardian,
7/13/16
Biogeography is the study of the
geographic distribution of living things. As you can imagine, when you stick
“palaeo” in front of it and apply it to fossils, not only will you win at
scrabble, but produce a science often confounded by a patchy fossil record, as
well as the changing configuration of the continents, natural disasters, and
many other biological and geographical phenomena. So how do
palaeobiogeographers explain how an animal that is tiny, burrows underground,
and has no legs, lives on multiple continents separated by the Atlantic Ocean?
When two or more populations of a
terrestrial animal group are found in vastly separated parts of the world, two
explanations are most often proposed. Firstly, that they spread by land from
one place to the other, then the populations in-between went extinct, leaving
two geographically distant populations. This is called dispersal. Another
explanation is plate tectonics: as the continents split they carried animals
with them, physically separating populations. This is an example of vicariance.
Dispersal and vicariance are the common and over-arching explanations that
account for the patterns of life on earth that take place over vast periods of
time.
Dispersal and vicariance are
sometimes seen to be at odds. Scientists can tend to favour one explanation over
the other as being the most important and frequent cause of animal distribution
patterns. For palaeontologists, there could be a tendency to view life in terms
of vicariance, particularly driven by the ancient distribution of continents
and plate-tectonic shifts. It makes sense to favour this when you spend your
career thinking in millions of years.
However, there are instances of
animal occurrence that continental drift can’t explain. If you look at
terrestrial life on earth and assume it could only disperse by walking from one
place to the next when the continents were connected, you get some pretty silly
estimates for splits between major animal groups. To take advantage of land
bridges to explain their dispersal, the first land animals would have to have
evolved millions of years before the Cambrian. As we know from fossils, the
first complex life on earth was only just evolving in our seas at that time.
Cambrian animals didn’t even have backbones, let alone a leg to stand on.
What if land animals frequently
“rafted” across seas and oceans to their new destinations?
Sound far-fetched? Well this
proposal is broadly accepted as the mechanism for several animal dispersals.
For example the distribution of mammals across the islands of the Caribbean
from mainland South America, such as monkeys and rodents. This series of small
jumps is also called island-hopping, and occurs when animals find themselves on
rafts of floating tangled vegetation, swept out to sea. Flyers fly, swimmers
swim, and it appears that land-lubbers that cannot swim across oceans, raft.
It’s all very well to imagine
this may happen between island chains; it is amazing but not impossible. Could
the same thing happen across an entire ocean? What about between Africa and the
Americas? That’s exactly what the worm-lizards have done. Not just once, but
twice.
The worm-lizards, Amphisbaenia,
are mostly legless squamates related to other lizards and snakes.
Amphisbaenians lost their legs independently of the snake lineage and belong to
their own distinct part of the squamate tree. Most species of worm-lizard still
retain remnants of their pelvis and pectoral girdle (hips and shoulders), but
only four species from Mexico out of the 180 currently known around the world
still have functioning forelimbs. The group as a whole gets its name from
Amphisbaena, the Greek serpent that had a head at each end. This is because the
first specimens to become known scientifically had a very similar tail and
head, ending bluntly and somewhat worm-like. They are vertebrates, and so have
skulls with varying numbers of teeth (they are carnivorous and insectivorous)
in a jawed mouth. They also have deeply recessed eyes that can discern light
from dark. They may look like earthworms, but inside they are still every bit
reptilian, with two lungs, one of which is squeezed and elongated while the
other is greatly reduced.
If you want to go looking for
these strange legless lizards, you’ll have your work cut out. Although they are
found all across South America, most of Africa, parts of the Middle East, North
America and Europe, they live underground, rarely surfacing from their burrows.
Most are less than 15cm long. This begs the question: how does such a reclusive
underground animal colonise so much of the world?
When both the DNA and fossil
evidence are studied together, it turns out that the ancestral subterranean
legless lizards first began splitting into different families around 109
million years ago in North America, where they are likely to have originated.
There was another major diversification between North American and European
amphisbaenians 40-56 million years ago. Finally the African and South American
forms split around 40 million years ago. These dates matter because the
Atlantic Ocean had fully formed by the time all of these splits took place. To
get from North America to Europe, then Africa to South America, these animals
must have crossed the ocean.
Worm-lizards therefore must have
“rafted” across the Atlantic. Natural erosion and storm events can loosen large
sections of soil, often bound together with tree roots, and wash it out to sea.
Some unsuspecting worm-lizards were set adrift this way, and the natural
direction of ocean currents and prevailing winds carried their life rafts to
shores new. Being able to survive without food for weeks, some of these sailors
became colonists.
Worm-lizards are not the only group
that have dispersed this way. But you have to wonder: what are the chances? How
could enough of any one species make it to new shores to breed and survive in
the long term? It just seems so improbable. For an animal like us, who lives to
around 100 years of age if they are lucky, we struggle to grasp probability
over longer time spans.
You often hear the phrase “a once
in a lifetime event” being used to describe huge natural disasters, such as the
tragic Boxing Day tsunami in 2004. After this event, natural and man-made
debris washed across the Pacific Ocean, reaching American coastlines. For
arguments sake, let’s assume something on that scale happens once in a hundred
years. Multiply that by the span of all modern humans, around 140,000 years.
That means humans have experienced this kind of natural disaster around one and
a half thousand times. Multiply this by geological time, and you have millions
of disasters befalling populations of humans and other animals.
Japanese tsunami sweeps dock to
Oregon beach
A cheery thought, no? The point
is that as unlikely as it seems for a legless lizard to be washed unharmed to
sea, float across the Atlantic for weeks, and make it to the next continent
only to find another legless lizard waiting for them to mate (either from a
previous journey, or from the same raft of earth as them), the chances are
actually pretty good given enough time. Of course, nature doesn’t evenly space
these events out, so two or three “once in a lifetime” events may happen within
the life-span of a single legless lizard.
So when it comes to the question
of dispersal versus vicariance, it would seem that the answer is a complex
interplay of both. No one explanation is “better” than the other, we must
instead look at the fossil and genetic evidence together, and work out for each
group of animals what the most likely explanation is for their distribution
across our little globe. In doing so, let’s not underestimate the role of vast
amounts of time on the likelihood of seemingly improbably events. Call it
serendipity if you will. If the chances are a million to one, on a geological
timescale I’ll take those odds.
References
Longrich, N. R., Vinter, J.,
Pyron, A., Pisani, D. and Gauthier, J. A. (2015) Biogeography of worm lizards
(Amphisbaenia) driven by end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Proceedings of the
Royal Society B, 282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.3034
Naish, D. (2014) Worm Lizards:
Lifestyles of the Limbless. Tetrapod zoology blog for Scientific American http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/worm-lizards-lifestyles-of-the-limbless/
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!